 | |
Commonwealth
Forests | | |
Accreditation6
The proliferation of degree programmes containing an element of forestry has presented a
challenge to those trying to ensure that the standards of forestry education are maintained.
The Institute of Foresters in Australia, the Institute of Chartered Foresters in the UK and the
Canadian Forestry Accreditation Board are examples of organisations that specify the
requirements of forestry education. Should attempts be made to suppress such courses,
thereby both ensuring that standards are maintained and protecting the more traditional
forestry programmes from competition? To a certain extent, this is already occurring within the
profession.
Within Canada, for example, a number of provinces have right to title legislation that states
that only registered professional foresters have the right to use the title “forester” or practice
forestry. This can be problematic, as what constitutes the required training for a forester in one
jurisdiction may not count in another. Much the same applies to universities. For example, the
Faculty of Graduate Studies at the University of British Columbia does not recognise the
degrees and certificates issued by the Indian Institute of Forest Management, but does
recognise the Indian Forest Service qualifications issued by the Forest Research Institute
Deemed University in Dehradun.
6See also Chapter 4 for a description of professional forestry institutes and associations
|