| |  | |
Commonwealth
Forests | | |
Illegal
logging3
Illegal activities associated with the timber trade cover a very wide range, from illegal logging
(for example, in breach of the contract or outside the concession area), smuggling (often
across national borders and sometimes of species restricted under CITES), misclassification
and corruption - either on a large scale or petty. One estimate has suggested that illegal
activities may account for over one tenth of value of the global timber trade, worth over $150
billion yearly (Brack, 2003) while a review of the timber harvesting industry between 2000 and
2005 in Papua New Guinea found that most were not only ecologically and economically
unsustainable but also illegal (Forest Trends, 2006). Illegal activities not only prevent the
sustainable management of a country’s forest and deprive it of revenue, but also undermine its
good governance by condoning disregard for the law and the tolerance of corruption. The
constraints to dealing with illegal logging include:
-
Lack of national capacity for the enforcement of forest (and other) laws, and co-ordination
-
The ease with which timber may be moved across national borders
-
The difficulty of distinguishing between legal and illegal timber
-
The frequent absence of a legal framework in importing countries to use against timber
produced illegally elsewhere.
Certification is part of, but not the complete answer to, combating illegal logging. Section (f)
above has shown that probably more than 17% of the forests of the Commonwealth are already
covered by certification schemes. Certification is, however, costly for small or community-owned
woodlands; even the scheme of the Forest Stewardship Council for Small and Low
Intensity Managed Forest Scheme is expensive (Butterfield et al. 2005).
Some high-tech solutions have been proposed to curb illegal logging - for example, Cameroon
has entered into partnership with the World Resources Institute’s Global Forest Watch to map
logging roads from satellite imagery (CFA Newsletter #28, March 2005), while the Indian State
of Kerala proposed embedding microchips in sandalwood trees to track them by remote
sensing (CFA Newsletter #27 of December 2004). But illegal logging will not be reduced
without good governance and competent and motivated staff to enforce the forest laws.
3 The Special Issue of the International Forestry Review 5 (3) of September 2003 is
an
authoritative review of illegal logging and the illegal trade in forest and timber products. More
recently, a joint meeting of the Commonwealth Forestry Association and the Royal
Commonwealth Society devoted to Trees, cash and politics: why good wood means good
business reviewed the both the international situation and the particular case of the UK. The
two presentations on that occasion, by Brack and Roby, are available on the CFA website
See also http://www.illegal-logging.info
|